Chip Bok for April 12, 2022

  1. 9dmn
    GOGOPOWERANGERS  about 2 years ago

    Nuclear is clean just difficult to remove waste

     •  Reply
  2. Yy
    Ballast  about 2 years ago

    If we had continued to put time, energy and money into alternative energy on an ongoing basis since the 70’s like some far-sighted people wanted, we wouldn’t be in such a mess now with respect to energy in the United States.

     •  Reply
  3. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  about 2 years ago

    What a crock.

     •  Reply
  4. Tf 117
    RAGs  about 2 years ago

    And Bok is subsisting on bullshit and a Russian stipend paid through the RNC.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Judge Magney  about 2 years ago

    Apparently Chip has never heard of hydroelectric power, or doesn’t admit it exists because so many dams were built by that daybed socialist FDR.

     •  Reply
  6. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 2 years ago

    I wish.

     •  Reply
  7. Rick and morty 91d86486 2737 4e8f a1ca 8e1b1ed1070d
    sevaar777  about 2 years ago

    The Bok “mind” , always showing ignorance is a preferred lifestyle.

     •  Reply
  8. Pat new 150
    Patjade  about 2 years ago

    I’m surprised Baghdad Bok moved beyond whaling for oil. He seems to be stuck in the last century.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    kelloggs2066  about 2 years ago

    There are so many people who don’t understand just how many people there are on the earth, and how much food and water and energy is needed to keep those people alive, healthy and not committing genocide over scarce resources.

    They all seem to think human beings with a million years of blood on our hands can all just get along peacefully under the heel of one giant boot… (As long as it’s their boot.)

     •  Reply
  10. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member about 2 years ago

    There will never be another coal fired plant built in America. It is not necessary. We may as well burn wood.

     •  Reply
  11. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Sure, Chip. Let’s just consume all the fossil fuel there is remaining. Pollute our atmosphere to the point of no return. Then what, Chip? Humm? Then what?

     •  Reply
  12. Blm
    1BlackLivesMatter Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Great toon, Chip! Drill, Dementia Joe, Drill!!!

     •  Reply
  13. Picture
    Ontman  about 2 years ago

    ^ Pipsqueak talking out of his arse again.

     •  Reply
  14. Screenshot 2023 12 10 091315
    Stephen Runnels Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Bok and his like-minded are purposefully practicing stupid if they can see the solar, wind, geothermal, and hydrological technology all around them and STILL pretend that old, filthy, environmentally destructive oil is actually the future of energy sustainability.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    jhayesd31  about 2 years ago

    The US uses more energy per person than almost any other nation. Only nations awash in energy use more than we do. Of Europe only Iceland with its renewables use more energy. All of the other nation of Europe including the much colder Scandinavian nations use much less energy.

    I don’t understand how we can be emaciated from lack of energy if we are the largest consumer.In short we are still energy Fat despite Boks Fantasy of a Staving Uncle Sam.

    He wants to make political hay over the high price of gasoline despite the fact that cheap gas is only made possible by the Death of Ukrainian Children.

    https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5988/economics/list-of-countries-energy-use-per-capita/
     •  Reply
  16. Img 2087
    Ivan the Terrible   about 2 years ago

    Ha, ha, ha! How’s that shutting down all nuclear working for Germany?

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    "It's the End of the World!!!" Premium Member about 2 years ago

    There is no way that our nation can push to power everything with solar and wind. I love solar, have it on my house. HUGE proponent of it. Make more than I use…….but I only MAKE juice when the sun is out. If I want a Powerwall it’s another $17,000, on top of the $30,000 I’ve already put into the panels.

    Wind is wonderful, love it. But it only MAKES juice when the wind is strong enough to move the turbines.

    We are not going to get away from fossil fuels in my lifetime I am pretty sure. But we can push to make things better.

    But then there’s the other issue that makes this difficult. The NIMBY crowd. I grew up in Massachusetts. They wanted to put turbines off the coast of Cape Cod. It was fought long and hard by…….wait for it…….the multi millionaires and rich and powerful (and might I add predominantly liberal folks, given that it is Massachusetts after all.) There was one powerful political family goes by the name of Kennedy that cough it hard.

    Go research CAPE WIND. They’re far from the only ones. There’s a new version of this being proposed now…….wanna guess who is fighting it?

     •  Reply
  18. Teamsters logo
    Local 574 Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Funny. Solar is another billionaire scam. Nuclear is the way to go. First fission. Later fusion. And BTW, the stewardship of nature falls to the working class.

     •  Reply
  19. Database download 512
    jader3rd  about 2 years ago

    More Nuclear.

     •  Reply
  20. Odin
    Holden Awn  about 2 years ago

    I’m all for electric vehicles, BUT — still no one has mentioned where all this new electricity is going to come from! The existing grid barely manages current (pun intended) demand as it is….

     •  Reply
  21. Minifig2
    Aliquid  about 2 years ago

    Ah yes, the “all or nothing” BS fallacy that your type loves to use for any level of progression. Here’s a crazy thought for you… you can do BOTH! Wow! Reduce coal and gas, but don’t give it up entirely.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    preacherman Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Uncle Sam’s emaciated appearance is due to our lack of really applying ourselves to alternative energy. It is the future not only for the benefits of cost and ease of production of the energy, but for the environmental benefits, as well.

     •  Reply
  23. Rl s pictures 032  2
    HT-Missouri  about 2 years ago

    Cheep.

     •  Reply
  24. Rl s pictures 032  2
    HT-Missouri  about 2 years ago

    Toons and doomsday predictions like this remind me of the beginnings of the interstate highway system around Colorado Springs when the highway builders began building overpasses and interchanges first across the eastern Colorado prairies on what would be I-70 and I-25. The conservative news services were ridiculing the highway department for wasting money and resources with poor planning. The engineers tried to explain the logic and efficiency of their design procedure, but numerous R legislators wanted to shut the whole thing down and they damned near nearly did. They never change.

     •  Reply
  25. Carthago delenda est
    Carthago delenda est  about 2 years ago

    I’m sure the residents of Mariupol are VERY sympathetic to this cartoon. /s

     •  Reply
  26. 1969 cv peace
    Subversive  about 2 years ago

    Had we started moving toward green energy independence about the time Ronny Raygun yanked the solar panels off the top of the White House, Uncle Sam would be pure muscle now!

     •  Reply
  27. 57
    oldlegodad71  about 2 years ago

    Fusion won’t have waste !

     •  Reply
  28. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 2 years ago

    How to spot the tricks Big Oil uses to subvert action on climate change

    Three ways fossil fuel companies try to trick the public.

    https://www.vox.com/22260311/oil-gas-fossil-fuel-companies-climate-change

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    j4m35  about 2 years ago

    The waste from mining and processing lithium is second in toxicity only to uranium.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Chip Bok