So, he’s wrong because… Austria?? And you’re right because… Limbaugh told you so?The Federalist Article that Rush refers to is pretty much a piece of fiction. The Foundation must be bad & corrupt because it’s the Clintons, seems to be the main evidence provided. It says only 10% of the money went to grants, yet the Foundation is very upfront that it is not a passthrough organization, but uses it’s own staff & does pay salaries & travel costs that some groups don’t incur.Yet, somehow Charity watch, which is a well respected evaluator of charities, gives them an A rating. Do you think maybe this is just stupid politics? Heaven forbid Hillary’s detractors actually engage on her actual policy positions.
So, he’s wrong because… Austria?? And you’re right because… Limbaugh told you so?The Federalist Article that Rush refers to is pretty much a piece of fiction. The Foundation must be bad & corrupt because it’s the Clintons, seems to be the main evidence provided. It says only 10% of the money went to grants, yet the Foundation is very upfront that it is not a passthrough organization, but uses it’s own staff & does pay salaries & travel costs that some groups don’t incur.Yet, somehow Charity watch, which is a well respected evaluator of charities, gives them an A rating. Do you think maybe this is just stupid politics? Heaven forbid Hillary’s detractors actually engage on her actual policy positions.