Missing large

aunt granny Free

Recent Comments

  1. about 10 hours ago on Herb and Jamaal

    Like the joke about the itemized bill for repairing a gadget:   “Tapping with hammer: $1.     Knowing where to tap, $1000.”

  2. about 12 hours ago on Agnes

    “I didn’t know carbon rims were an option.” Neither did I. Well, I think they’ve been mentioned on Rec.Bicycles.Tech, but I didn’t pay attention.

  3. 1 day ago on Agnes

    I never started — and they don’t make carbon rims to fit my Fuji Gran Tourer.

  4. 2 days ago on Dogs of C-Kennel

    Except for hopping, kangaroos are exactly like deer: leave deer pellets, eat your garden, run in front of your car and get killed . . .

    But I hear that they are tastier than venison.

  5. 2 days ago on Agnes

    “i would’ve spent the extra yen for a bike that self-sews…”   No need now.   It’s possible to buy clinchers almost as light as olde-time tubulars.

    Wikipedia claims that tubulars are making a comeback on carbon-fiber rims.

  6. 2 days ago on Frazz

    When something stops working, one stops using it.   That change has never changed.

    I think I know of a place on the non-Web internet where I can get data on section houses (which had half-mile lanes).

  7. 3 days ago on Pickles

    Listen to them grumble, they mutter and they roar, because the Wabash Cannonball don’t stop here any more.

    I rode it from Tecumseh to Lafayette shortly before it died.

  8. 3 days ago on B.C.

    That’s “Cute Chick”.

  9. 3 days ago on Frazz

    When I first got on the Web (calling it the Internet is like calling a steamboat the Mississippi), I could plug a few keywords into a search engine, find a word in the first hit that was unlikely to occur on the page I wanted, add it to the search list with “-” in front, and quickly drill down to the desired information.

    That doesn’t work any more.

    And if you want information on an obscure topic that has the same name as a popular topic, forget it.

    Data is not information.

  10. 4 days ago on Back to B.C.

    XIX was a mistake.   We should have insisted that “persons” in XIV included female persons.