The Reich-wing is so excited about Oprah winning, they could still have a celebrity billionaire, but she wouldn’t be as crazy as the one they elected last time. The only question is how to get the neo-Nazis to vote for a candidate who is neither white nor male?
Oprah comes off progressive and lovely, but she’s still a billionaire TV personality who has thrown at least one person under the bus to save her reputation. I probably wouldn’t vote for her.
.
If the Dems were going to push a celebrity to run against Trump, they should pick Martha Steward. She combines Hillary’s perceived financial corruption and reputation as a stone cold B with Oprah’s name recognition and media prowess. As an added bonus, she has a sizable following of housewives and gays, and no one is more qualified than her to make the White House festive as sh-t for every single holiday imaginable.
robnvon Premium Member over 6 years ago
What Happened Again?
Mr. Blawt over 6 years ago
The Reich-wing is so excited about Oprah winning, they could still have a celebrity billionaire, but she wouldn’t be as crazy as the one they elected last time. The only question is how to get the neo-Nazis to vote for a candidate who is neither white nor male?
Jason Allen over 6 years ago
Oprah comes off progressive and lovely, but she’s still a billionaire TV personality who has thrown at least one person under the bus to save her reputation. I probably wouldn’t vote for her.
.
If the Dems were going to push a celebrity to run against Trump, they should pick Martha Steward. She combines Hillary’s perceived financial corruption and reputation as a stone cold B with Oprah’s name recognition and media prowess. As an added bonus, she has a sizable following of housewives and gays, and no one is more qualified than her to make the White House festive as sh-t for every single holiday imaginable.
Daeder over 6 years ago
I thought they already decided the next season of “Celebrity Presidential Election” would be between Susan Sarandon and Ted Nugent?